# kaal:claim:2834531-043

**Claim.** The sandbox generates legitimacy as well as information: because the tested technology remains open to discussion and democratic supervision, public entitlement to participate in regulatory debates creates a renewed sense of legitimacy that justifies the regulation.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- where the technology has consequences that flow into everyday lives

**Source quote.**

> In this way, public entitlement to participate in regulatory debates can help to create a renewed sense of legitimacy that justifies the regulation.

**From.** Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, *Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law* (2017), C. The Minimum Regulatory Sandbox, page 33

**Cite as.** Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834531

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `9cd875ebdb0266febbdcdabfca5b9b9f0de1b7ad9e3d5a8a5971bdbe469323b7` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Fenwick%20et%20al.%20-%202017%20-%20Regulation%20Tomorrow%20What%20Happens%20When%20Technology%20Is%20Faster%20Than%20the%20Law.pdf

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation

**Keywords.** regulatory-sandbox, legitimacy, democratic-participation, regulatory-design

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.