# kaal:claim:2922176-037

**Claim.** Contemporary corporate governance reforms are unlikely to work as policymakers and regulators intend, because experts agree improvement is needed but disagree widely on what good corporate governance is or how to achieve it.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> Contemporary corporate governance reforms are unlikely to work as intended by policymakers and regulators.

**From.** Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, *The ‘Unmediated’ and ‘Tech-Driven’ Corporate Governance of Today's Winning Companies* (2017), VII. Outlook, page 48

**Cite as.** Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, The ‘Unmediated’ and ‘Tech-Driven’ Corporate Governance of Today's Winning Companies (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2922176

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `fa4e986917d437cb1504281e7b986be2698e9507d8feaf426c9d7d1754ca882c` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Fenwick%20et%20al.%20-%202017%20-%20The%20%E2%80%98Unmediated%E2%80%99%20and%20%E2%80%98Tech-Driven%E2%80%99%20Corporate%20Governance%20of%20Today%27s%20Winning%20Companies.pdf

**Failure mode.** reform intent gap  (family: board-and-oversight-failure)

**Topics.** governance-design, corporate-governance, consensus-and-security

**Keywords.** corporate-governance-reform, policy-failure, regulation, consensus

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.