# kaal:claim:2939127-003

**Claim.** Even the law firms that are best at finding innovative solutions for clients remain reluctant to fully adopt Legal Tech innovations, so quality of client service does not predict willingness to adopt.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- law firms and in-house legal departments as of 2017

**Source quote.**

> While the better firms often find innovative solutions to their clients' problems, even those firms are reluctant to fully embrace Legal Tech innovations.

**From.** Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, *Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution* (2017), I. Introduction, page 4

**Cite as.** Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2939127

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `abcef529c7200261c59eec43018375b3b26e3186239fb9d002bacc298dba26ff` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Fenwick%20et%20al.%20-%202017%20-%20Legal%20Education%20in%20the%20Blockchain%20Revolution.pdf

**Failure mode.** innovation-reluctance-of-leading-firms  (family: incumbent-resistance-to-adoption)

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, innovation, education-and-practice

**Keywords.** legal-tech, law-firms, innovation-adoption, legal-profession

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.