# kaal:claim:2939127-027

**Claim.** Contract law rules on formation, interpretation, conditions, and remedies require substantive adjustment before smart contracts can be accommodated.

**Type.** condition  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- existing contract law doctrine applied to blockchain smart contracts

**Source quote.**

> Contractual legal rules regarding formation, interpretation, conditions, and remedies require substantive adjustments of smart contracts in contract law.

**From.** Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, *Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution* (2017), III.4. Limitations, page 30

**Cite as.** Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2939127

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `abcef529c7200261c59eec43018375b3b26e3186239fb9d002bacc298dba26ff` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Fenwick%20et%20al.%20-%202017%20-%20Legal%20Education%20in%20the%20Blockchain%20Revolution.pdf

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, smart-contracts

**Keywords.** contract-law, smart-contracts, legal-reform, remedies

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3409548-015
- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998033-004
- supported_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-017

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.