# kaal:claim:2992962-002

**Claim.** The authors stipulate distributed jurisdiction as a regulatory alternative in which conflict resolution for blockchain transactions is supplied by governance solutions inherent in the blockchain technology itself rather than by external legal authorities.

**Type.** definitional  **Support.** asserted

**Source quote.**

> We suggest a regulatory alternative for blockchain-based conflict resolution by way of governance solutions inherent in the blockchain technology itself. We call this alternative "distributed jurisdiction".

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, *Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution* (2017), I. Introduction, page 4

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Calcaterra%20-%202017%20-%20Crypto%20Transaction%20Dispute%20Resolution.pdf

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, governance-design, blockchain, systemic-risk

**Keywords.** distributed-jurisdiction, governance, blockchain, dispute-resolution

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.