# kaal:claim:2992962-015

**Claim.** Not all smart contracts are fully anonymous and untouchable by traditional jurisdictional means, because contracts with a physical performance element, such as peer to peer transportation, do not automatically anonymize the parties.

**Type.** condition  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- consumer smart contracts with a physical performance element

**Source quote.**

> Not all smart contracts are fully anonymous and untouchable by traditional jurisdictional means. Some smart contracts will not automatically anonymize the parties because there is a physical element to such a consumer contract.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, *Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution* (2017), a) Anonymity of Blockchain Transactions, page 37

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Calcaterra%20-%202017%20-%20Crypto%20Transaction%20Dispute%20Resolution.pdf

**Topics.** smart-contracts, law-and-legal-systems

**Keywords.** anonymity, smart-contracts, jurisdiction, scope-limits

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.