# kaal:claim:2992962-024

**Claim.** Governing the creation and use of a blockchain may be the only practical way of exercising any form of traditional jurisdiction over blockchain technology.

**Type.** condition  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- blockchains whose creators live in identifiable geographic locations

**Source quote.**

> In fact, governing the creation and use of a blockchain may be the only practical way of exercising any form of traditional jurisdiction over blockchain.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, *Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution* (2017), a) Jurisdiction Over Creation and Use of Blockchain Technology, page 43

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Calcaterra%20-%202017%20-%20Crypto%20Transaction%20Dispute%20Resolution.pdf

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, blockchain, dynamic-regulation

**Keywords.** jurisdiction, blockchain-creation, regulatory-design, traditional-law

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.