# kaal:claim:2992962-026

**Claim.** The benefits of coding existing law into smart contracts are only temporary, because as smart contracting evolves over time fewer smart contracting solutions will have a real world equivalent.

**Type.** predictive  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- over the course of smart contracting's evolution

**Source quote.**

> The benefits of this hybrid approach are only temporary. As smart contracting evolves over time, fewer smart contracting solutions will have a real-world equivalent.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, *Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution* (2017), b) Coding Existing Law Into Smart Contracts, page 45

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Calcaterra%20-%202017%20-%20Crypto%20Transaction%20Dispute%20Resolution.pdf

**Failure mode.** hybrid-coding-obsolescence  (family: transition-and-migration-risk)

**Topics.** smart-contracts, law-and-legal-systems

**Keywords.** hybrid-regulation, smart-contracts, legal-equivalence, obsolescence

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.