# kaal:claim:2992962-028

**Claim.** The first of the two core requirements the authors set for distributed jurisdiction is that the anonymity of blockchain based smart contracting be maintained as the technology evolves.

**Type.** condition  **Support.** asserted

**Source quote.**

> Our proposal in this paper for a distributed jurisdiction over blockchains has to fulfill two core requirements: 1. The anonymity of blockchain-based smart contracting has to be maintained as the technology evolves.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, *Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution* (2017), IV. Distributed Jurisdiction, page 47

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Calcaterra%20-%202017%20-%20Crypto%20Transaction%20Dispute%20Resolution.pdf

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, smart-contracts

**Keywords.** distributed-jurisdiction, anonymity, design-requirements, smart-contracts

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.