# kaal:claim:2992962-029

**Claim.** The second core requirement of distributed jurisdiction is governance from within the blockchain technology itself, which is what allows the problems inherent in blockchain based smart contracts to be effectively addressed.

**Type.** condition  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> Distributed Jurisdictional means necessitate governance from within the blockchain technology itself to effectively address the problems inherent in blockchain-based smart contracts.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, *Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution* (2017), IV. Distributed Jurisdiction, page 47

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Calcaterra%20-%202017%20-%20Crypto%20Transaction%20Dispute%20Resolution.pdf

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, blockchain, governance-design, systemic-risk

**Keywords.** distributed-jurisdiction, intra-blockchain-governance, design-requirements, dispute-resolution

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.