# kaal:claim:2992962-033

**Claim.** Aragon appears not to post even a summary of its arbiters' reasoning, which may cause the losing party to second guess the legitimacy of the entire Aragon dispute resolution mechanism.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- the Aragon Network dispute resolution design as described in its whitepaper

**Source quote.**

> In fact, Aragon appears to not even post a summary of their arbiters' reasoning which may cause the losing party to second guess the legitimacy of the entire dispute resolution mechanism in Aragon.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, *Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution* (2017), 2. Intra-Blockchain Solutions: OpenBazaar, page 52

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Calcaterra%20-%202017%20-%20Crypto%20Transaction%20Dispute%20Resolution.pdf

**Failure mode.** unreasoned-decisions-undermine-legitimacy  (family: disclosure-ineffectiveness)

**Topics.** systemic-risk, law-and-legal-systems

**Keywords.** aragon, reasoned-decisions, legitimacy, dispute-resolution

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.