# kaal:claim:2992962-034

**Claim.** Without judge expertise in the subject matter of a smart contract dispute, user confidence in effective and fair conflict resolution is undermined, which reduces confidence in crypto transactions as a whole and can undermine the evolution of the crypto economy.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- dispute resolution systems that select judges at random from all users, such as Aragon

**Source quote.**

> Without judge's expertise in a given smart contract subject matter of a dispute user confidence in effective and fair conflict resolution is undermined which leads to overall less confidence in crypto transactions as a whole and can undermine the evolution of the crypto economy.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, *Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution* (2017), 3. Limitations of Existing Solutions, page 52

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Calcaterra%20-%202017%20-%20Crypto%20Transaction%20Dispute%20Resolution.pdf

**Failure mode.** arbiter-expertise-deficit  (family: supervisory-capacity-gap)

**Topics.** economics

**Keywords.** arbiter-expertise, aragon, user-confidence, crypto-economy

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.