# kaal:claim:2998033-009

**Claim.** As of the publication of this article, a review of published court opinions showed that no court had reviewed, assessed, or scrutinized the uses and applications of blockchain technology.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** evidenced

**Holds when.**

- based on a Westlaw search of federal and state cases as of 2017

**Source quote.**

> However, a review of published court opinions suggests that no court at the time of publication of this article had to review, assess, or scrutinize the uses and applications of blockchain technology.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Blockchain Innovation for Private Investment Funds* (2017), II.5. Regulatory Implications, page 14

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Innovation for Private Investment Funds (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998033

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `aafb1be3c25cd33da477d759df9ca2f856f0a8fe133d6396da2e75d0af573dbd` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202017%20-%20Blockchain%20Innovation%20for%20Private%20Investment%20Funds.pdf

**Topics.** blockchain

**Keywords.** case-law, judicial-treatment, regulatory-uncertainty, blockchain

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3002908-008
- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3002908-002

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.