# kaal:claim:2998097-030

**Claim.** The legal standards applicable to private fund investor due diligence are somewhat inconsistent and suboptimal and merit clarification.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** evidenced

**Holds when.**

- private fund investor due diligence litigation record, 1995 to 2015

**Source quote.**

> The study demonstrated that the legal standards applicable to private fund investor due diligence were somewhat inconsistent and suboptimal and merited clarification.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Private Investment Fund Regulation - Theory and Empirical Evidence from 1998 to 2016* (2017), IV.3 Private Fund Investor Due Diligence, page 40

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Private Investment Fund Regulation - Theory and Empirical Evidence from 1998 to 2016 (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998097

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `0955054f49c7011d33c285579bb046e6b284e42755b10fd2546a728c202669d5` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202017%20-%20Private%20Investment%20Fund%20Regulation%20-%20Theory%20and%20Empirical%20Evidence%20from%201998%20to%202016.pdf

**Failure mode.** Inconsistent due diligence legal standards  (family: harmonization-and-standardization-failure)

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems

**Keywords.** due-diligence, legal-standards, inconsistency, judicial-guidance

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2811718-034
- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2811718-005

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.