# kaal:claim:3071378-036

**Claim.** In a DAO, disenfranchised community members cannot be judged by race or cultural biases because performance in an anonymized proposal voting scheme is the only basis for assessment and payment.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- anonymized proposal voting and token-based remuneration

**Source quote.**

> this means they will not and cannot be judged by race or cultural biases. Instead, their performance in an anonymized proposal voting scheme is the only basis for assessment and payment.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Blockchain Technology and Race in Corporate America* (2017), IV.2 DAOs as Equalizing Organizations, page 25

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Technology and Race in Corporate America (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3071378

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `125f01674d13b6bb0310c4be7a20ff538dccbc36ecf352770b3c580028387edd` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202017%20-%20Blockchain%20Technology%20and%20Race%20in%20Corporate%20America.pdf

**Topics.** dao, research-methods

**Keywords.** dao, anonymized-assessment, performance-measurement, race-neutrality

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.