# kaal:claim:3117224-013

**Claim.** The top 25 ICO jurisdictions in this study are identified from ICO WatchList data, which ranks countries by the number of ICOs launched and reports how much was raised through those ICO projects.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** evidenced

**Holds when.**

- top 25 ICO countries
- ICO WatchList as the underlying data source

**Source quote.**

> To determine the ICO's used for this project, the author used data generated by ICO WatchList.1 ICO WatchList ranks countries by the number of ICO's launched and provides information as to how much was raised through these ICO projects.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Initial Coin Offerings The Top 25 Jurisdictions and Their Comparative Regulatory Responses* (2018), III. Top 25 ICO Countries, page 5

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Initial Coin Offerings The Top 25 Jurisdictions and Their Comparative Regulatory Responses (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3117224

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `83e9ccb9219a217d9fcfc5c098b897229ee7cf85623bee3ae22d2e986548466b` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202018%20-%20Initial%20Coin%20Offerings%20The%20Top%2025%20Jurisdictions%20and%20Their%20Comparative%20Regulatory%20Responses.pdf

**Topics.** research-methods, securities-law, open-source-and-code

**Keywords.** methodology, icowatchlist, comparative-regulation, coding

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.