# kaal:claim:3117224-020

**Claim.** The United States was excluded from the comparative jurisdictional analysis because its regulatory setup for cryptocurrencies and DLT business was still too uncertain at the time of publication.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** asserted

**Holds when.**

- as of publication in 2018

**Source quote.**

> The regulatory setup for cryptocurrencies and DLT business was still too uncertain in the United States to be included in the below discussion at the time of publication of this article.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Initial Coin Offerings The Top 25 Jurisdictions and Their Comparative Regulatory Responses* (2018), IV. Regulatory Responses, page 11

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Initial Coin Offerings The Top 25 Jurisdictions and Their Comparative Regulatory Responses (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3117224

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `83e9ccb9219a217d9fcfc5c098b897229ee7cf85623bee3ae22d2e986548466b` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202018%20-%20Initial%20Coin%20Offerings%20The%20Top%2025%20Jurisdictions%20and%20Their%20Comparative%20Regulatory%20Responses.pdf

**Topics.** research-methods

**Keywords.** united-states, regulatory-uncertainty, methodology, scope

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.