# kaal:claim:3125822-003

**Claim.** The problems of corruption, Sybil attacks, and tyranny of the majority have plagued every previous autonomous decentralized reputation platform, so they are the design constraints any new architecture must meet.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** asserted

**Holds when.**

- prior autonomous decentralized reputation platforms

**Source quote.**

> These are the respective problems of corruption, Sybil attacks, and tyranny of the majority that have plagued all previous autonomous, decentralized reputation platforms.

**From.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vlad Andrei, *Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and A* (2018), 1 Motivation, page 4

**Cite as.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vlad Andrei, Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and A (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `d4d0bbaa3260968226186131d60e6d64a53e904d94e4295c61fd17042f1191ef` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Calcaterra%20et%20al.%20-%202018%20-%20Blockchain%20Infrastructure%20for%20Measuring%20Domain%20Specific%20Reputation%20in%20Autonomous%20Decentralized%20and%20A.pdf

**Failure mode.** prior platform failure  (family: reputation-system-gaming)

**Topics.** consensus-and-security, reputation

**Keywords.** sybil-attack, tyranny-of-the-majority, reputation-corruption, prior-art

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3128900-018
- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4796714-021

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.