# kaal:claim:3125822-009

**Claim.** The platform's ability to function among anonymous and potentially hostile users is conditional: it holds only if smart contracts that engage experts for off-platform work voluntarily include the recommended protocol choices, which the minimal core itself does not require.

**Type.** condition  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- core imposes no smart contracting language
- depends on expert policing of non compliant contracts

**Source quote.**

> However, the platform was designed to thrive in an environment with anonymous, potentially hostile users, if the following choices are chosen to be included in all smart contracts which use experts for off-platform work:

**From.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vlad Andrei, *Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and A* (2018), 3.2.4 Contract freedom and fees, page 11

**Cite as.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vlad Andrei, Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and A (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `d4d0bbaa3260968226186131d60e6d64a53e904d94e4295c61fd17042f1191ef` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Calcaterra%20et%20al.%20-%202018%20-%20Blockchain%20Infrastructure%20for%20Measuring%20Domain%20Specific%20Reputation%20in%20Autonomous%20Decentralized%20and%20A.pdf

**Topics.** institutional-design

**Keywords.** hostile-environment, protocol-adoption, minimal-core, freedom-of-contract

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.