# kaal:claim:3227967-041

**Claim.** If standardized legal work and legal research can be performed by algorithms, the result is an opportunity rather than a threat, because it frees lawyer time for assisting clients with the new and very specific challenges of the digital world.

**Type.** predictive  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- successful algorithmic automation of standardized legal work

**Source quote.**

> If the "standardized work" and legal research activities can be performed by algorithms, there is more time for assisting the client with the new and very specific challenges of the digital world.

**From.** Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, *Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters* (2018), X. Conclusion, page 33

**Cite as.** Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `f6e13b956f864ab32ec3305d095a35a127770327d75b3688f785cefc437d369f` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Fenwick%20et%20al.%20-%202018%20-%20Legal%20Education%20in%20a%20Digital%20Age%20Why%20%27Coding%20for%20Lawyers%27%20Matters.pdf

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, education-and-practice

**Keywords.** automation, legal-profession, legal-tech, client-service

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.
