# kaal:claim:3266953-002

**Claim.** Adding more regulations, processes and procedures cannot restore confidence in institutions, because the traditional trust and cohesion mechanisms have already reached their limits.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- attempts to restore institutionalized trust

**Source quote.**

> To restore confidence in the "old world", efforts have tended to focus on introducing and implementing more regulations, processes, and procedures. Yet, the traditional trust and cohesion mechanisms have reached their limits.

**From.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, *Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper* (2018), Trust Crises on the Internet, page 6

**Cite as.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `781758dea356e55d79c73ad7f1debe7c83de398bd1cd9e0a9a6c2802f276b4c0` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Calcaterra%20et%20al.%20-%202018%20-%20Reputation%20Protocol%20for%20the%20Internet%20of%20Trust%20-%20Conceptual%20Whitepaper.pdf

**Failure mode.** exhausted regulatory remedy  (family: rule-obsolescence-and-ossification)

**Topics.** reputation, institutional-design

**Keywords.** institutional-trust, regulation, trust-mechanisms, remedy-failure

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.