# kaal:claim:3266953-003

**Claim.** Digitized and automated trust is not a stable substitute for institutional trust, because it is experiencing crises of its own that undermine the proliferation of value enhancing internet based platform businesses and distributed ledger technology businesses.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- trust migrated from organizations to machines and algorithms

**Source quote.**

> Yet, this digitized trust is experiencing its own crises which undermines the proliferation of value-enhancing internet-based platform businesses and DLT businesses.

**From.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, *Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper* (2018), Trust Crises on the Internet, page 6

**Cite as.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `781758dea356e55d79c73ad7f1debe7c83de398bd1cd9e0a9a6c2802f276b4c0` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Calcaterra%20et%20al.%20-%202018%20-%20Reputation%20Protocol%20for%20the%20Internet%20of%20Trust%20-%20Conceptual%20Whitepaper.pdf

**Failure mode.** digitized trust crisis  (family: adoption-and-usability-barrier)

**Topics.** reputation, decentralization, blockchain

**Keywords.** digital-trust, platform-business, distributed-ledger, trust-crisis

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.