# kaal:claim:3709041-017

**Claim.** Under a quadratic style microdemocratic allocation, each voter receives a capped number of votes to distribute by priority, so voters concentrate votes on the issues most relevant to them and outcomes track actual preference intensity.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- requires an electronic voting system with a capped per voter vote allocation

**Source quote.**

> Each voter in a given microdemocratic voting scenario may be allocated a maximum number of votes. Such votes may be allocated by priority to any issues the respective voter wants to engage with.

**From.** Kaal, *Blockchain Technology for Good* (2020), II.2 Microdemocracy, page 13

**Cite as.** Kaal, Blockchain Technology for Good (2020). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3709041

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `5216a7bca45a48e3bef11ec524936e66af737c0fd66271e9f6866dc20a4482cc` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202020%20-%20Blockchain%20Technology%20for%20Good.pdf

**Topics.** governance-design

**Keywords.** quadratic-voting, microdemocracy, preference-intensity, voting-design

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808867-015

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.