# kaal:claim:3782203-006

**Claim.** To achieve stability a DAO must institute a dynamic governance system that includes clear and accessible processes both for amending the rules and for appealing the automated conclusions reached by smart contracts.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- DAOs governed by smart contracts

**Source quote.**

> Therefore, to achieve stability a DAO must institute a dynamic governance system with a clear and accessible processes for amending the rules and appealing the automated conclusion of smart contracts.

**From.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, *A Technical Perspective on Decentralization* (2021), Chapter 6. Technical perspective, page 3

**Cite as.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, A Technical Perspective on Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782203

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `ab8a22d0dbb026a09212a4c85963f3c05787cf80775e8613ae3724e3883e7a56` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Calcaterra%20and%20Kaal%20-%202021%20-%20A%20Technical%20Perspective%20on%20Decentralization.pdf

**Topics.** governance-design, smart-contracts, dao

**Keywords.** dynamic-governance, amendment-process, smart-contract-appeals, dao-stability

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4067783-023

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.