# kaal:claim:3782203-040

**Claim.** Sharing all fees with all members eliminates the incentive to review a product favorably because its sponsor paid a large fee, since a single expert reviewer cannot be cheaply bribed when the fee is distributed across the whole membership.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- review DAOs where fees are pooled and shared by reputation weight
- randomly assigned reviewers

**Source quote.**

> Since all fees are shared with all members, this eliminates the incentive to positively review software just because a company sends a big fee.

**From.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, *A Technical Perspective on Decentralization* (2021), How to build a DAO, page 24

**Cite as.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, A Technical Perspective on Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782203

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `ab8a22d0dbb026a09212a4c85963f3c05787cf80775e8613ae3724e3883e7a56` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Calcaterra%20and%20Kaal%20-%202021%20-%20A%20Technical%20Perspective%20on%20Decentralization.pdf

**Topics.** dao

**Keywords.** bribery-resistance, fee-pooling, review-integrity, dao-design

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.