# kaal:claim:3782214-010

**Claim.** Designing a single consensus algorithm is vastly easier than designing a consensus algorithm that can incorporate all future updates to itself, which explains why immature decentralized systems lack sophisticated governance mechanisms.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** asserted

**Source quote.**

> Designing a single consensus algorithm is infinitely easier than designing a consensus algorithm that will incorporate all future updates to the consensus algorithm.

**From.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, *Decentralized Governance* (2021), Chapter 6. Governance, page 6

**Cite as.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Governance (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782214

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `ba892bb200c1455447c0014f5067a501a93ea9ec413c31942d95952eb3bdfd9d` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Calcaterra%20and%20Kaal%20-%202021%20-%20Decentralized%20Governance.pdf

**Topics.** consensus-and-security, governance-design, dao

**Keywords.** consensus-algorithms, self-amending-protocols, governance-design, dao-governance

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.
