# kaal:claim:3782214-027

**Claim.** The two sources of instability require different remedies and must not be swapped: dynamic rules are a mismatch for instability caused by the profit motive, and a reputational system is not an efficient method for attenuating instability caused by a group's diverse values.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** asserted

**Source quote.**

> Trying to institute dynamic rules to attenuate the instability due to a for-profit motive is a mismatch. Similarly instituting a reputational system is not an efficient method for attenuating the instability due to a group's diverse values.

**From.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, *Decentralized Governance* (2021), Reputation counters instability from profit motive, page 12

**Cite as.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Governance (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782214

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `ba892bb200c1455447c0014f5067a501a93ea9ec413c31942d95952eb3bdfd9d` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Calcaterra%20and%20Kaal%20-%202021%20-%20Decentralized%20Governance.pdf

**Failure mode.** remedy mismatch  (family: other)

**Topics.** reputation, governance-design

**Keywords.** reputation, dynamic-rules, governance-design, remedy-selection

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.