# kaal:claim:3782220-023

**Claim.** Beyond any Folk Theorem justification for stability, the ultimate reason not to impose a clear distinction between the individual and the social is that no such clear distinction exists in nature, and a network's values must reflect that vagueness.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> Beyond any Folk Theorem justification for stability, the ulti- mate reason we should not impose a clear distinction between the two is that there is no clear distinction in nature.

**From.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, *The Importance of Transcendental Unifying Values for Decentralization* (2021), Integrating polar values, page 7

**Cite as.** Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Transcendental Unifying Values for Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782220

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `f0bf1e80c6da60a6f8ba20630562bdf1dab171ccb5267f497dc0b815113cde99` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Calcaterra%20and%20Kaal%20-%202021%20-%20The%20Importance%20of%20Transcendental%20Unifying%20Values%20for%20Decentralization.pdf

**Topics.** institutional-design

**Keywords.** individual-social-boundary, natural-vagueness, folk-theorems, dependence

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.