# kaal:claim:3981021-028

**Claim.** Reputation staking overcomes the polarizing effects and suboptimal vote outcomes produced by one token one vote voting mechanisms.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** asserted

**Holds when.**

- governance systems choosing between token weighted and reputation weighted voting

**Source quote.**

> First, it overcomes the all too common polarizing effects and suboptimal vote outcomes of one- token-one-vote voting mechanisms.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Optimize Charitable Giving* (2021), Governance, Reputation Staking for the Common Good, page 27

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Optimize Charitable Giving (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3981021

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `9d8bc78d119c780c96c89ce3e820f4ac8b037d39b3ade59feb4e40d46b048288` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202021%20-%20How%20Decentralized%20Autonomous%20Organizations%20Optimize%20Charitable%20Giving.pdf

**Failure mode.** Polarizing outcomes of one token one vote  (family: plutocratic-capture)

**Topics.** reputation, tokenomics, governance-design

**Keywords.** reputation-staking, one-token-one-vote, polarization, voting-design

**Related claims.**

- supported_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4067783-033
- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4685567-025
- extends: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-030
- generalizes: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5887242-009
- extends: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-027

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.