# kaal:claim:3995709-008

**Claim.** Failing to maximize developer participation and communication negatively affects the code review process and creates unnecessary costs on software development, and this is difficult to remedy because code review is subject to sensitivities arising from the egos of the individuals involved.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- code review conducted among human peers

**Source quote.**

> Therefore, failing to maximize developer participation and communication may negatively affect the code review process. This ultimately results in inefficiencies in the review process creating unnecessary costs on software development.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards* (2021), Developer Participation, page 9

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `6d77dbfb15ee86080bfde0b98089180cabafeb6defdf0f05eaaeb3cb99871e89` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202021%20-%20How%20DAOs%20Optimize%20Open-Source%20Code%20Reviews%20and%20Create%20Open-Source%20Standards.pdf

**Failure mode.** insufficient developer participation  (family: governance-participation-collapse)

**Topics.** open-source-and-code

**Keywords.** developer-participation, human-human-issues, review-costs, failure-mode

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.