# kaal:claim:4067783-014

**Claim.** Defending a DAO against attackers and looters, and punishing self-dealing, requires sustainable decentralized governance built on non-fungible tokens rather than tradable voting power.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> The takeover of the Build Finance DAO highlights the need for sustainable decentralized governance solutions with non-fungible tokens to defend the DAO from attackers/looters and punish self- dealing.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *DAO Fallacies* (2022), II.2.b) External Takeovers, page 8

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `48f1e307cdbbe28c7843f7744d0ba8cf01662f257a53f2066a7a6c7e03a5acec` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202022%20-%20DAO%20Fallacies.pdf

**Topics.** tokenomics, governance-design, consensus-and-security

**Keywords.** non-fungible-tokens, governance-design, attack-resistance, self-dealing

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3441904-038
- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-028

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.