# kaal:claim:4067783-017

**Claim.** Workable DAO governance should account for reputation with non-fungible tokens or weighted keys rather than fungible tokens, so that voting weight tracks reputation instead of purchasing power.

**Type.** design  **Support.** asserted

**Source quote.**

> 1. Non-fungible Tokens or weighted keys, among other electronic accounting methods as accounting for reputation score NOT fungible tokens

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *DAO Fallacies* (2022), II.3 Myth #3: Ungovernable, page 9

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `48f1e307cdbbe28c7843f7744d0ba8cf01662f257a53f2066a7a6c7e03a5acec` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202022%20-%20DAO%20Fallacies.pdf

**Topics.** reputation, tokenomics, governance-design

**Keywords.** reputation-score, non-fungible-tokens, voting-weight, governance-design

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3441904-041
- extends: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-030
- extends: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-025

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.