# kaal:claim:4067783-018

**Claim.** DAO governance should use a two vote model that distinguishes a loosely coupled vote, where no reputation is at stake, from a tightly coupled vote, where the voter's reputation is at stake.

**Type.** design  **Support.** asserted

**Source quote.**

> 2. Two vote model a) loosely coupled vote (no reputation at stake), b) tightly coupled vote (reputation at stake)

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *DAO Fallacies* (2022), II.3 Myth #3: Ungovernable, page 9

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `48f1e307cdbbe28c7843f7744d0ba8cf01662f257a53f2066a7a6c7e03a5acec` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202022%20-%20DAO%20Fallacies.pdf

**Topics.** reputation, governance-design

**Keywords.** two-vote-model, reputation-at-stake, governance-design, voting

**Related claims.**

- extends: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-026
- extends: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3931933-038
- extends: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3949098-034
- extends: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-027

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.