# kaal:claim:4067783-033

**Claim.** Braintrust demonstrates that innovation in work structure does not cure governance design: despite redefining work outcomes, it uses a suboptimal one token, one vote model that grants proportional control over network governance.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- governance by one token, one vote

**Source quote.**

> Despite its advances in innovation for redefining work outcomes, Braintrust uses a suboptimal governance model with a one token, one vote system for proportional control over how the network is governed.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *DAO Fallacies* (2022), III.2 Use #2: Future of Work - Work to Earn, page 13

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `48f1e307cdbbe28c7843f7744d0ba8cf01662f257a53f2066a7a6c7e03a5acec` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202022%20-%20DAO%20Fallacies.pdf

**Failure mode.** One token one vote proportional control  (family: plutocratic-capture)

**Topics.** reputation, tokenomics, governance-design

**Keywords.** braintrust, one-token-one-vote, governance-design, talent-network

**Related claims.**

- supports: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-028

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.