# kaal:claim:4067783-034

**Claim.** Work-to-earn DAOs must leave it entirely to each member how much time they contribute; DAOs that impose quotas and participation requirements may not be sustainable long-term in a value-to-efforts workflow environment.

**Type.** condition  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- work-to-earn DAOs seeking to attract long-term talent

**Source quote.**

> In order to attract long-term talent, it needs to be always up to each individual DAO member how much time they put in. DAOs that create quota and participation requirements may not be sustainable long-term in a work-to-earn value-to-efforts workflow environment.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *DAO Fallacies* (2022), III.2.c) Work-To-Earn, page 14

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `48f1e307cdbbe28c7843f7744d0ba8cf01662f257a53f2066a7a6c7e03a5acec` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202022%20-%20DAO%20Fallacies.pdf

**Failure mode.** Quota and participation requirements in work-to-earn  (family: governance-participation-collapse)

**Topics.** institutional-design

**Keywords.** work-to-earn, quotas, talent-retention, voluntary-contribution

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.