# kaal:claim:4529715-006

**Claim.** Attack resistance across the studied DAOs averages 4.05 out of 10, and Charity DAOs perform worst in this category, with the best of them, VitaDAO, scoring 3 out of 10 and the remainder at 2 or less.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** evidenced

**Source quote.**

> Based on the compiled data shown in the graph above, the average score for attack resistance is 4.05 out of 10. Charity DAOs showed the worst performance in this category with the highest, VitaDAO, scoring a 3 out of 10 and the rest at 2 or less.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, *Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis* (2023), Descriptive statistics, page 36

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis (2023). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4529715

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `2d71961e8c449afbeaf45ca4f53de8a575d45c77d6960b767d3d1d0874f296b5` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Bykowski%20-%202023%20-%20Decentralized%20Autonomous%20Organizations%20%28DAO%29%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Market%20Meta%20Analysis.pdf

**Failure mode.** charity-dao-attack-exposure  (family: consensus-and-protocol-attack)

**Topics.** dao, consensus-and-security, empirical-evidence

**Keywords.** dao, attack-resistance, charity-daos, empirical-scores

**Superseded by.** A later claim revises this one. Prefer quoting: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-021

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.