# kaal:claim:4529715-019

**Claim.** Quadratic voting remains open to manipulation and strategic voting, and it depends on a robust and transparent voting system to count votes accurately.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- quadratic voting model

**Source quote.**

> However, quadratic voting also has some limitations and challenges, such as the potential for manipulation or strategic voting, and the need for a robust and transparent voting system to ensure that all votes are counted accurately.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, *Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis* (2023), DAO Governance Standards, page 13

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis (2023). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4529715

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `2d71961e8c449afbeaf45ca4f53de8a575d45c77d6960b767d3d1d0874f296b5` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Bykowski%20-%202023%20-%20Decentralized%20Autonomous%20Organizations%20%28DAO%29%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Market%20Meta%20Analysis.pdf

**Failure mode.** quadratic-voting-manipulation  (family: governance-participation-collapse)

**Topics.** dao, governance-design

**Keywords.** dao, quadratic-voting, strategic-voting, voting-models

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.