# kaal:claim:4529715-037

**Claim.** A DAO built on reputation rather than a fungible token, as CRDAO is, makes the 51 percent attack nearly impossible and renders sock puppet attacks technically possible but of little influence.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- reputation based governance
- no fungible governance token

**Source quote.**

> CRDAO is fairly attack resistant because of its use of reputation. As a result, sock puppet attacks are technically possible, but would have little influence. CRDAO does not appear to have a fungible token, so the 51 percent attack is nearly impossible.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, *Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis* (2023), Appendix, Services DAOs, CRDAO, page 165

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis (2023). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4529715

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `2d71961e8c449afbeaf45ca4f53de8a575d45c77d6960b767d3d1d0874f296b5` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Bykowski%20-%202023%20-%20Decentralized%20Autonomous%20Organizations%20%28DAO%29%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Market%20Meta%20Analysis.pdf

**Topics.** dao, reputation, governance-design, consensus-and-security

**Keywords.** dao, reputational-governance, attack-resistance, crdao, non-fungible-reputation

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-027
- supported_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-030
- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-013
- supported_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-038

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.