# kaal:claim:4685567-016

**Claim.** Impact measurement in Impact 2.0 has no settled standard: consensus on measurement methodologies and metrics remains elusive, which produces divergent approaches and hinders comparability across programs and sectors.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** evidenced

**Holds when.**

- Impact 2.0 measurement practice

**Source quote.**

> Standardization and consensus on measurement methodologies and metrics remain elusive, leading to variations in approaches and sometimes hindering comparability 67 across different programs or sectors.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0* (2024), Impact measurement, page 26

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4685567

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `87fb1be89d2661967ed2b0b673fe26448ded3bc3119b122177a4fc13ae5c085c` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202024%20-%20Impact%20Investing%20Innovation%20-%20From%20Impact%201.0%20to%203.0.pdf

**Failure mode.** Non Comparable Impact Metrics  (family: measurement-and-metric-failure)

**Topics.** research-methods

**Keywords.** impact-measurement, standardization, comparability, impact-2-0

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.