# kaal:claim:4685567-021

**Claim.** Retroactive public goods funding via results oracles in DAO format fails at the governance layer: even where the core resource distribution concept works, the project remains exposed to decentralized governance attack vectors because the governance design lacks attack resistance.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- results oracle operating as a DAO
- retroactive public goods funding designs

**Source quote.**

> The key downside of these types of oracles in DAO format are decentralized governance attack vectors. In other wods, even if the core concept of resource distribution works well enough, the overall projet is typically subject to the downsides that derive from lack of attack resistance

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0* (2024), Impact 3.0, page 38

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4685567

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `87fb1be89d2661967ed2b0b673fe26448ded3bc3119b122177a4fc13ae5c085c` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202024%20-%20Impact%20Investing%20Innovation%20-%20From%20Impact%201.0%20to%203.0.pdf

**Failure mode.** Governance Attack Vector in Funding Oracles  (family: oracle-and-input-corruption)

**Topics.** consensus-and-security, governance-design, dao, smart-contracts

**Keywords.** governance-attack-vectors, dao, retroactive-funding, results-oracle, attack-resistance

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.
