# kaal:claim:4734750-020

**Claim.** Clients have little or no recourse when reviewed code turns out to be flawed even after a functionality and quality review has been performed and paid for.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** asserted

**Source quote.**

> Moreover, there is little or no recourse for clients in cases in which the code proved to be flawed even after functionality and quality review.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Code Review DAO* (2024), No Controls, page 16

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202024%20-%20Code%20Review%20DAO.pdf

**Failure mode.** No client recourse  (family: legal-personality-and-liability-gap)

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, compliance, economics, open-source-and-code

**Keywords.** recourse, liability, audit-accountability, code-review-market

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-023
- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4755632-026

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.