# kaal:claim:4734750-025

**Claim.** The existing code review market provides no publicly transparent pricing of review services, and that opacity arguably harms the public for the benefit of a few market players and their clients.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> The existing code review market does not provide publicly transparent pricing of code review services.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Code Review DAO* (2024), Price Discovery, page 18

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202024%20-%20Code%20Review%20DAO.pdf

**Failure mode.** Price opacity  (family: information-asymmetry)

**Topics.** disclosure, economics, open-source-and-code

**Keywords.** price-opacity, price-discovery, public-interest, code-review-market

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4755632-031
- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-033
- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4755632-025

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.