# kaal:claim:4734750-029

**Claim.** The community audit should proceed in two stages: an informal vote that reveals collective wisdom to all members, followed by a formal vote in which staked reputation tokens are at risk, and this sequence gives job posters significant quality assurances.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> Once the entire community knows how each member feels about the code review examined, the CRDAO now votes in a formal vote in which the reputation tokens staked are at risk.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Code Review DAO* (2024), Community Audit, page 20

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202024%20-%20Code%20Review%20DAO.pdf

**Topics.** governance-design, reputation, compliance

**Keywords.** two-stage-voting, reputation-staking, community-audit, quality-assurance

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4755632-034
- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4685567-020

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.