# kaal:claim:4796714-034

**Claim.** Routing proposals through the Forum and then through Validation Pool review is what allows the input parameters and learning data of AI systems to be governed by expert community consensus, because only vetted and consensus backed data and parameters reach AI development.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- requires an operating DAO with reputation tokens and validation pools
- applies to input parameters and training data selection

**Source quote.**

> This process involves submitting proposals to the Forum and undergoing Validation Pool review, ensuring that only vetted and consensus-backed data and parameters are utilized in AI development.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *AI Governance* (2024), Governance Mechanism, page 37

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4796714

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `59fa63bae179e8f9b6b8efbdf90cee28400276512a1b04f9f579a48641305c93` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202024%20-%20AI%20Governance.pdf

**Topics.** governance-design, ai-and-agents, education-and-practice, dao, consensus-and-security

**Keywords.** validation-pool, community-governance, training-data, dao, expert-consensus

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-033
- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-028
- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-030

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.