# kaal:claim:5245185-011

**Claim.** The existing framework for monitoring AI agents on cryptocurrency payment rails identifies the key actors but fails to deliver viable solutions, because it does not specify scalability and adaptability challenges and omits critical risks.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- current monitoring ecosystem across exchanges, infrastructure providers, compliance services, developers and owners

**Source quote.**

> while identifying key actors, falls short of delivering viable solutions. In particular, it fails to identify specifically scalability and adaptability challenges, and omits critical risks.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *How can we Best Monitor AI Agents* (2025), 6.1. Gaps in Current Monitoring Viability, page 11

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, How can we Best Monitor AI Agents (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5245185

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `4d7adba83ec722480e97bde6528cbe9ce98c709e45cb18794f157a64b8fe7da2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202025%20-%20How%20can%20we%20Best%20Monitor%20AI%20Agents.pdf

**Failure mode.** actor-mapping-without-solutions  (family: research-design-limitation)

**Topics.** compliance, risk-and-incentives

**Keywords.** monitoring-framework, scalability, adaptability, risk-omission

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.