# kaal:claim:5245185-013

**Claim.** The proposed solutions for future AI monitoring fail to propose feedback driven mechanisms that balance innovation with oversight, which leaves regulatory gaps and scalability bottlenecks unresolved.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- forward looking monitoring proposals for AI agents on cryptocurrency rails

**Source quote.**

> The expected solutions for future AI monitoring fail to propose feedback-driven mechanisms,107 to balance innovation with oversight, leaving regulatory gaps and scalability bottlenecks unresolved.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *How can we Best Monitor AI Agents* (2025), 6.1. Gaps in Current Monitoring Viability, page 11

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, How can we Best Monitor AI Agents (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5245185

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `4d7adba83ec722480e97bde6528cbe9ce98c709e45cb18794f157a64b8fe7da2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202025%20-%20How%20can%20we%20Best%20Monitor%20AI%20Agents.pdf

**Failure mode.** missing-feedback-mechanisms  (family: ai-oversight-and-alignment-gap)

**Topics.** compliance

**Keywords.** feedback-loops, regulatory-gaps, scalability-bottlenecks, monitoring-framework

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.