# kaal:claim:5245185-016

**Claim.** Infrastructure level permissioning neglects critical risks such as smart contract exploits, bugs, and permission conflicts, and proposes no real time enforcement across distributed nodes, which weakens its claim to bridge AI autonomy and accountability.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- permissioned transaction controls embedded in smart contracts

**Source quote.**

> also neglects critical risks, such as smart contract exploits, bugs, or permission conflicts, and fails to propose real-time enforcement solutions across distributed nodes.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *How can we Best Monitor AI Agents* (2025), 6.1.2. Adaptability and Risk Mitigation in Blockchain Infrastructure Providers, page 11

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, How can we Best Monitor AI Agents (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5245185

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `4d7adba83ec722480e97bde6528cbe9ce98c709e45cb18794f157a64b8fe7da2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202025%20-%20How%20can%20we%20Best%20Monitor%20AI%20Agents.pdf

**Failure mode.** unmitigated-contract-risk  (family: smart-contract-bug-and-exploit)

**Topics.** smart-contracts, compliance

**Keywords.** smart-contract-exploits, permission-conflicts, real-time-enforcement, accountability

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.