# kaal:claim:5254152-001

**Claim.** One-person-one-vote in DAOs equalizes voting power across participants regardless of financial stake, but it creates the risk of majority tyranny.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** asserted

**Holds when.**

- DAOs using a one-person-one-vote governance model

**Source quote.**

> This model ensures equal voting power for all participants, promoting democratic decision-making but potentially leading to majority tyranny.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024* (2024), One-Person-One-Vote, page 5

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254152

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `bb2052d809a4615f0f3e2526ba6416293c40d00260149ba4fe6f38addf052796` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202024%20-%20DAO%20Market%20Meta%20Analysis%202024.pdf

**Failure mode.** majority tyranny under equal voting  (family: governance-participation-collapse)

**Topics.** dao, governance-design

**Keywords.** dao-governance, voting-models, one-person-one-vote, majority-tyranny

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4529715-018

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.