# kaal:claim:5541658-018

**Claim.** Generative AI such as ChatGPT cannot produce justified beliefs aligned with virtue jurisprudence because it lacks the human virtues that responsive judging requires.

**Type.** condition  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- judging evaluated under a virtue jurisprudence standard

**Source quote.**

> Generative AI, such as ChatGPT, cannot produce justified beliefs aligned with virtue jurisprudence, as it lacks the human virtues required for responsive judging.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, *The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law* (2025), A. Contextual Understanding, page 25

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Gray%20-%202025%20-%20The%20Evolving%20Role%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20in%20Law.pdf

**Failure mode.** virtue deficit in generative judging  (family: human-judgment-displacement)

**Topics.** ai-and-agents

**Keywords.** virtue-jurisprudence, generative-ai, responsive-judging, limitations

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.