# kaal:claim:5541658-027

**Claim.** Proposed regulatory remedies such as mandatory bias audits fail in practice because they lack clear implementation guidelines, which hinders their practical adoption.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- proposed rather than enacted frameworks for auditing judicial AI

**Source quote.**

> Proposed frameworks, such as bias audits, lack clear implementation guidelines, hindering practical adoption.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, *The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law* (2025), Challenges in Regulation, page 31

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Gray%20-%202025%20-%20The%20Evolving%20Role%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20in%20Law.pdf

**Failure mode.** implementation gap in bias audits  (family: ai-oversight-and-alignment-gap)

**Topics.** compliance

**Keywords.** bias-audits, implementation-gap, regulation, fairness-standards

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.